"In his thought-provoking keynote at the 2024 ASU+GSV Summit, Ethan Mollick (Professor, Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania) argues that the rapid advancement of AI is causing a "homework apocalypse" in education, as AI can now easily complete most assignments better than students. However, rather than viewing this as a crisis, Mollick sees it as an opportunity for educators to transform the way they teach by integrating AI tools into their classrooms. He encourages teachers to experiment with AI, build their own AI-powered educational tools, and share their findings with the wider community, ultimately democratizing access to educational technology and ensuring that AI has a positive impact on education." -ASU-GSV Keynote Description
*The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania's Practical AI for Instructors and Students Series are linked in the Additional Resources tab in this LibGuide.
Attribution: Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom by Alison Gurganus for San Diego Mesa College is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, except where otherwise noted.
Here's What Some Fellow Educators Have to Say:
Why Large Language Models Like Chat GPT Treat Black and White Sounding Names Differently. Written by Monica Schreiber at the Stanford UniversityHuman-Centered Artificial Intelligence. March, 2024.
Universities Have a Computer-Science Problem: The case for teaching coders to speak French. The Atlantic. March 19, 2024
Adapting College Writing for the Age of Large Language Models such as ChatGPT. Written by Anna Mills and Lauren M.E. Goodlad for the Critical AI Blog at Rutgers University. Updated April 2023.
AI Guidance. Poorvu Center for Teaching and Learning, Yale University. Updated Regularly. 2024.
Resource Guide for ChatGPT. Center for Teaching and Learning. Northern Illinois University. Updated Regularly. 2024.
Generative AI in First-Year Writing: An early analysis of affordances, limitations, and a framework for the future: Written by Robert E. Cummings, Stephen M. Monroe & Marc Watkins. Computers and Composition. Vol. 71. March 2024.
ChatGPT Teacher Tutorial: AI For Your ESL Class! YouTube Video, 9 min 20 sec. 2023.
ESL Meets AI: How We Can Make Our Lives Easier with ChatGPT. YouTube Video, 6 minutes and 6 sec. 2023
Leveraging ChatGPT: Practical Ideas for Educators. Written by Zak Cohan. The Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. January, 2023.
Chat GPT in the Classroom with Rebecca Beck February 2023. Higher Ed Tech Podcast (46 minutes and 38 seconds). February, 2023.
Designing Assignments in the ChatGPT Era Written by Susan D'Agostino. Inside Higher Ed. January, 2023.
From Transactional to Transformational Teaching. Written by Steven Mintz. Inside Higher Education. January 2022
Attribution: Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom by Alison Gurganus for San Diego Mesa College is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, except where otherwise noted.
Guidance for Online Course Development and the use of Artificial Intelligence Tools: A Guide for Faculty. Created by Oregon State University. Updated regularly. 2024.
A Critical Review of GenAI Policies in Higher Education Assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Written by Jaihui Luo. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Ed. February 4, 2024.
Guidance on Maintaining Academic Integrity in an Artificial Intelligence World. CSUN Memorandum with FAQ's on academic integrity with AI in the classroom. 8/25/2023.
Promoting Authenticity of Student Work in the Age of Artificial Intelligence: A faculty guide. Center for Teaching and Learning Enhancement at Lamar University. 8/2023.
Syllabi Policies For AI Generative Tools. Document Being Updated Regularly. 2024.
Artificial Intelligence and Teaching (Briefly explains AI in the classroom and gives sample syllabi policies). Univ. Wisconsin, Milwaukee. 2024.
Cornerstone and AI Generated Writing: Guidelines. Purdue University. 1/3/2023.
Rules for Tools, (One page classroom policy on how to use media in classroom work). Hiedelberg University of Education. October 1st 2023.
Foundation Model Class Policy. Prof Ryan Baker at University of Pennsylvania. 2023.
The above policy was shared on LinkedIn and a very interesting conversation ensued: Click Here
Attribution: Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom by Alison Gurganus for San Diego Mesa College is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, except where otherwise noted.
Detection tools are controversial and, on their own, do not stand up to academic integrity challenges. If you'd like to read more about this, Vanderbilt University turned off their TurnItIn subscription, here's the article.
With that said, there are tools that are being created to help us figure out if something was created by AI Large Language Models such as ChatGPT.
Please understand that these tools are not foolproof and students can use them as easily as we can however, you may find them useful as a starting point.
GPTZero: This is a free (with paid upgrade), non-commercial, tool. Documents are scored by how much may have been written by AI. Each sentence written by AI is highlighted.
ChatGPT: You can actually use ChatGPT to check if something was generated by AI. Simply ask it "was this created by artificial intelligence?" and put in the piece of work.
AI Classifier: A resource that distinguishes between AI and human written text brought to you by the creators of ChatGPT.
Attribution: Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom by Alison Gurganus for San Diego Mesa College is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, except where otherwise noted.
Attribution: Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom by Alison Gurganus for San Diego Mesa College is licensed CC BY-NC 4.0, except where otherwise noted.
The following are example Syllabus Statements that Drake Memorial Library has modified from other Universities. You are welcome to modify these statements as needed to best fit your course.
This document is managed by Lance Eaton and has many examples. There is also a spreadsheet version that allows for filtering.
Attribution: Drake Memorial Library and SUNY Brockport.
During this course, you may use generative AI (e.g. ChatGPT, Gemini, Copilot, etc.) to assist with assignments providing that you also do the following:
Failure to acknowledge the use of AI on course assignments will result in a required 1-on-1 meeting with me. During this meeting, If you cannot appropriately demonstrate your understanding of the course material (you must do so without reciting your assignment to me), you will receive a zero on the assignment and may receive a charge of academic dishonesty as defined in the SUNY Brockport Academic Dishonesty Policy.
Written by: Logan Rath
AI Use Statement and Reflection
This document is referred to in the above policy.
This course encourages students to explore the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools such as ChatGPT for all assignments and assessments. Any such use must be appropriately acknowledged and cited. It is each student’s responsibility to assess the validity and applicability of any AI output that is submitted; you are ultimately responsible. Violations of this policy will be considered academic dishonesty and fall under SUNY Brockport's Academic Dishonesty Policy for determining appropriate consequences. We draw your attention to the fact that different classes can implement different AI policies, and it is your responsibility to conform to expectations for each course.
Modified from: Harvard
Students in this course are encouraged to explore the use of AI-based tools (such as ChatGPT) when completing assignments. All sources, including AI tools, must be properly cited. Use of AI without proper citation will be considered academic dishonesty and subject to disciplinary action according to SUNY Brockport's Academic Dishonesty Policy.
Please note that AI results can be biased and inaccurate. It is your responsibility to ensure that the information you use from AI is accurate. Additionally, pay attention to the privacy of your data. Many AI tools will incorporate and use any content you share, so be careful not to unintentionally share copyrighted materials, original work, or personal information.
Learning how to thoughtfully and strategically use AI-based tools may help you develop your skills, refine your work, and prepare you for your future career. If you have any questions about citation or about what constitutes academic integrity in this course or at the SUNY Brockport, please feel free to contact me to discuss your concerns.
Modified from: University of Washington
In this course, we may use generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT) to examine the ways in which these kinds of tools may inform our exploration of the topics of the class. You will be informed as to when and how these tools will be used, along with guidance for attribution if/as needed. Any use of generative AI tools outside of these parameters constitutes plagiarism and may result in a charge of academic dishonesty as defined in the SUNY Brockport Academic Dishonesty Policy.
Modified from: UT Austin
We may use artificial intelligence (AI) tools and applications (such as ChatGPT, DALL-E, etc.) in some circumstances in this course as they support the course learning objectives. The specifics of when, where and how these tools are permitted will be included with each assignment, along with guidance for attribution. Any use of these tools other than where indicated is a violation of this course’s expectations and will be addressed through SUNY Brockport's Academic Dishonesty Policy.
Modified from: UW-Madison
The use of generative AI tools or apps for assignments in this course, including tools like ChatGPT and other AI writing or coding assistants, is prohibited. Detection of the use of AI tools may result in disciplinary action following SUNY Brockport's Academic Dishonesty Policy.
Adapted from: University of Toronto
Oregon State University’s “Bloom’s Taxonomy Revisited” provides a framework for assignment and assessment design in the age of AI.
Accessible Document on Bloom's Taxonomy Revisited by Oregon State University
Attribution: Creative Commons license: This work created by Oregon State University Ecampus is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Reference 909-384-8289 • Circulation 909-384-4448